[PATCH libinput v2 0/4] touchpad gestures support

Hans de Goede hdegoede at redhat.com
Fri Apr 24 04:49:55 PDT 2015


On 24-04-15 13:39, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hey Hans :),
> On jue, 2015-03-26 at 10:04 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Here is v2 of my touchpad gestures support patch series, changes
>> since v1:
>> - Merge the gesture capability flag and event-debug patched into
>>    the "touchpad: Add an API for touchpad gesture events"
>> - Update the swipe and pinch/rotate implementations to work with the
>> new
>>    typesafe device and normalized coordinates (rebased on latest
>> master),
>>    this results in a nice cleanup
> During the last days I played with these last patches on Clutter, and
> found the gestures to work nicely. I gathered some observations though:
>        * Higher level gesture implementations usually have a "cancel"
>          signal/vfunc, it feels kind of weird not being able to fully
>          map the behaviors. I thought about some "this gesture maybe
>          continues onto something else" flag in *_END events, although
>          I see this working better on touchpoints being added than
>          lifted, given how things seem to work. Anyway, just a remark,
>          I see cancellation being more important in the protocol
>          additions this would bring, when this involves client vs
>          compositor handling.

As discussed at Fosdem, adding a flag to indicate of the gesture
ended normally (all fingers lifted) or by transitioning into something
else is easy code wise. If you see a need for that I can do so for v3
of the patch-set.

>        * I think it is a bit unfortunate that distance in pinch
>          gestures is relative. Higher level equivalent "zoom" gestures
>          usually offer absolute scale values (taking the initial
>          distance as 1x). We do lack some information there to
>          translate from one to the other, I guess either knowing the
>          initial distance (does pointer acceleration apply here?), or
>          offering similar info right away would be nice.

I've been ping-ponging between giving deltas or an absolute distance
in mm. I can change the patch-set to report a distance in mm instead
of delta from the previous distance, with the caveat that on some
touchpads we do not know the resolution so the unit there will
not be mm, but instead unknown stepsize.

>        * From trying things out, I found that if I pinch the fingers
>          too close (X1 Carbon 1st gen here, 2fg touchpad), and then
>          move them together around, the pinch gesture would report
>          distance jumps (self-cancelled overall though), In evemu
>          -record traces I see 2 separate tracking IDs, and didn't seem
>          to see such wild coordinate jumps, so I wonder if we can do
>          something about it, I can investigate further about it if you
>          want.

The distance events are pretty raw (unfiltered) what you're seeing can
happen if we get touch1 moves, sync, touch2 moves, sync. Are you seeing
that in the evemu-record traces? I can try to add some averaging to the
distance like we do with pointer move events, or I can keep giving you
the raw events and you can filter yourself ...

Downside of pushing the filtering into the toolkit is that each toolkit
needs to redo it, so I guess it would be better to do it at the
libinput level.

> But overall, it looks quite good to me. Although I didn't get too deep
> in reviewing code, the general logic seems sound to me.

Thanks, that is good to hear.



More information about the wayland-devel mailing list