[PATCH wayland] RFC: Require WAYLAND_DISPLAY to be set instead of using wayland-0 as the default

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 02:23:19 PDT 2015


On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:12:42 +1000
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:41:08PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 May 2015 01:12:15 -0700
> > Dima Ryazanov <dima at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Although defaulting to wayland-0 seems convenient, it has an undesirable
> > > side effect: clients may unintentionally connect to the wrong compositor.
> > > Generally, it's safer to fail instead. Here's a real example:

...

> > 
> > gathering the comments from the thread, it seems we have Acked-bys from:
> > Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com>
> > Giulio Camuffo <giuliocamuffo at gmail.com>
> > Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>
> > "Jasper St. Pierre" <jstpierre at mecheye.net>
> > 
> > Seems like a pretty strong set. Would you like to send a non-RFC
> > version of this patch?
> > 
> > I think you can include also the above Acked-bys.
> 
> if you need another vote to tilt the favours, you can add 
> Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> 
> sorry, didn't see this earlier.

Hi Peter,

thanks, and sorry I didn't see your reply before I pushed. :-D
- pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20150814/d8bd5110/attachment.sig>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list