wl_surface.attach with NULL wl_buffer behaviour
Prabhu S
prabhusundar at gmail.com
Fri Aug 21 17:04:11 PDT 2015
Below is the case where I'm getting stuck with the actual test case.
Wondering why there is no callback wl_callback at 25.done or
wl_buffer at 29.release
The EGL implementation depends on these callback/buffer release.
Also noticed if the valid buffer is attached immediately after null buffer,
everything is fine, so most of the time it is unnoticed. If the frame is
complex, egl will attach after null frame.
I will keep debug if any other race conditions in my implementation.
[3741557.293] -> wl_surface at 20.frame(new id wl_callback at 25)
[3741557.476] -> wl_surface at 20.attach(wl_buffer at 29, 0, 0)
[3741557.676] -> wl_surface at 20.damage(0, 0, 800, 480)
[3741557.906] -> wl_surface at 20.commit() <=EGL
[3741558.500] -> wl_surface at 20.attach(nil, 0, 0) <=QTWayland
[3741558.604] -> wl_surface at 20.commit() <=QTWayland
stuck
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre at mecheye.net>
wrote:
> We need to fix that documentation, then, along with fixing Weston.
> mutter will give you an error with this event stream, since attaching
> a NULL buffer for an xdg_surface is invalid.
>
> This behavior is one of the reasons why I removed this ability from
> xdg_surface and instead made it an error -- the semantics were
> extremely unclear, and practically the same as destroying and
> recreating the xdg_surface. Please do that instead.
>
> However crazy it is, the logic sort of makes sense -- the "frame"
> event is guaranteed to be called once a frame when the surface content
> is painted and shown on the screen. When there's no surface content,
> it isn't painted, so the frame event isn't called.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean about a buffer release event -- you never
> attached a buffer to begin with, so I can't imagine how you'll get an
> event on it.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Prabhu S <prabhusundar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Based on the wayland protocol specification for wl_surface::attach
> >>>If wl_surface.attach is sent with a NULL wl_buffer, the following
> >>> wl_surface.commit will remove the surface content.
> >
> > Wondering if wl_surface_attach called with wl_buffer=NULL, will there be
> any
> > wl_buffer release event or frame callbacks?
> >
> > Modified the redraw in simple-shm.c as below and not receiving any
> callback
> > or buffer release. It just got stuck.
> > The same thing is being done in qtwayland to hide the surface and it is
> > getting stuck. Some help to check this case would be helpful.
> >
> > static int odd = 1;
> > if(odd == 1){
> > wl_surface_attach(window->surface, buffer->buffer, 0, 0);
> > wl_surface_damage(window->surface,
> > 20, 20, window->width - 40, window->height -
> 40);
> > odd = 0;
> > }
> > else{
> > wl_surface_attach(window->surface, 0, 0, 0);
> > wl_surface_damage(window->surface,
> > 0, 0, 0, 0);
> > odd=1;
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > [823379.816] -> wl_compositor at 4.create_surface(new id wl_surface at 3)
> > [823379.949] -> xdg_shell at 6.get_xdg_surface(new id xdg_surface at 7,
> > wl_surface at 3)
> > [823380.120] -> xdg_surface at 7.set_title("simple-shm")
> > [823380.244] -> wl_surface at 3.damage(0, 0, 250, 250)
> > [823381.333] -> wl_shm at 5.create_pool(new id wl_shm_pool at 8, fd 5,
> 250000)
> > [823381.561] -> wl_shm_pool at 8.create_buffer(new id wl_buffer at 9, 0, 250,
> > 250, 1000, 1)
> > [823381.870] -> wl_shm_pool at 8.destroy()
> > [823384.880] -> wl_surface at 3.attach(wl_buffer at 9, 0, 0)
> > [823385.095] -> wl_surface at 3.damage(20, 20, 210, 210)
> > [823385.317] -> wl_surface at 3.frame(new id wl_callback at 10)
> > [823385.443] -> wl_surface at 3.commit()
> > [823388.852] wl_display at 1.delete_id(8)
> > [823388.979] xdg_surface at 7.configure(0, 0, array, 4)
> > [823389.238] -> xdg_surface at 7.ack_configure(4)
> > [823401.773] wl_display at 1.delete_id(10)
> > [823401.908] wl_buffer at 9.release()
> > [823401.991] wl_callback at 10.done(4056537)
> > [823404.239] -> wl_surface at 3.attach(nil, 0, 0)
> > [823404.442] -> wl_surface at 3.damage(0, 0, 0, 0)
> > [823404.663] -> wl_surface at 3.frame(new id wl_callback at 10)
> > [823404.792] -> wl_surface at 3.commit()
> > [823406.292] xdg_surface at 7.configure(0, 0, array, 5)
> > [823406.524] -> xdg_surface at 7.ack_configure(5)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wayland-devel mailing list
> > wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jasper
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20150821/a88b50e9/attachment.html>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list