[PATCH weston 1/2] configure.ac: Don't look for Xwayland in the weston install destination
derekf at osg.samsung.com
Tue Feb 10 08:03:04 PST 2015
On 10/02/15 09:22 AM, sardemff7+wayland at sardemff7.net wrote:
> On 2015-02-10 03:15, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>> Turns out the issue I've run into is that the --with-xserver-path
>> setting doesn't get passed down into distcheck, which calls configure
>> like this:
>> && $(am__cd) $(distdir)/_build \
>> && ../configure \
>> $(AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS) \
>> $(DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS) \
>> --srcdir=.. --prefix="$$dc_install_base" \
>> && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) \
>> Setting --with-xserver-path in AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS doesn't seem
>> to work (it ends up confusing config.sub mightily), but setting it in
>> DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS seems to produce valid results.
> DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is for user-defined distcheck flags, you must
> not define in your Makefile.am. I would rather find what is going on
> with AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS, any log to share?
Actually, I think DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is exactly what Bryce wants
to use for this.
Bryce has Xwayland installed in a non-standard location so as to not
interfere with his system binaries, so we don't want anything in
Makefile.am to be specific to his installation anyway.
should make the test pass just fine, and I think it's reasonable to
expect that without any good way to detect Xwayland's location.
FWIW, I still think the patch that started this thread is worthwhile,
More information about the wayland-devel