[PATCH 6/8] doc: compress the lists in the protocol docs some

[Bill Spitzak]

On 01/21/2015 08:17 AM, Derek Foreman wrote:

> I generally like the end result of this, but I don't really like the way
> summary is jammed up against type (when summary exists):
> name
>    uint unique name for the object
>
> I think it might be better with a - or with summary in ().  However, I
> think that's a fairly minor complaint.

I may be able to fix that, I think I fixed a similar glitch elsewhere 
when there was no text.