[PATCH] build: always build wayland-scanner
bryce at osg.samsung.com
Mon Jul 6 18:54:27 PDT 2015
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 20:40, Bryce Harrington <bryce at osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> > An even cleaner solution would be to break the scanner out as a separate
> > source package from libwayland. Then all this mess can be handled
> > through normal package dependencies.
> For such a small tool with a fairly simple solution in cross compiles, I
> wouldn't call this a "mess". ICU, now *that's* a mess to build in cross.
Ok, 'mess' is perhaps overstated, but I was also thinking back to
earlier idiosyncracies we've worked around that, IMHO, would be avoided
if the wayland protocol sources and the protocol scanner were two
In any case, this is not a critique of your patch, and I suppose if I'm
serious about proposing this, I should write it up as a serious
More information about the wayland-devel