[PATCH v2 wayland] protocol: add wl_pointer.axis_frame events
Jonas Ådahl
jadahl at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 00:21:21 PDT 2015
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:01:20PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 03:58:47PM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:01:48PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > To group separate vertical/horizontal scroll events together. Likewise it
> > > enables axis_stop events to be grouped so that the final vector for kinetic
> > > scrolling may be calculated correctly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> > > ---
> > > Changes to v1:
> > > - drop the option of having multiple axis sources within the same frame
> > > (and reword the documentation accordingly)
> > >
> > > Two comments here:
> > > - the protocol feels a bit unbalanced now when discrete events are in use,
> > > these must still be sent before the matching axis events. i.e. we have 4
> > > events that commit with the axis_frame, but one event (discrete) that
> > > commit with the axis event:
> > > axis_source
> > > axis
> > > axis_discrete
> > > axis
> > > axis_frame
> > > though sending the source just before the frame may make this a bit easier
> > > on the eye
> >
> > The "unbalancedness" I feel is that "axis_source" is a bit "let-loose"
> > as it doesn't extend some other event, but kind of belong to axis_frame.
> > So ...
> >
> > > - we could now skip the source and merge it into the axis_frame event,
> > > though that would require the return of the "unknown" source.
> >
> > .. now that we always have a single source per frame, I think this would
> > make sense to do. An 'unknown' source I guess is not that big of a
> > change, semantically. IIRC the issue with it was that a device
> > which previously would have source "unknown" would suddenly change if we
> > learned about it, but as long as we say that might happen, maybe its not
> > an issue really.
> >
> > Otherwise, maybe it'd be best to make axis_source extend axis_frame
> > like all other such events, i.e. use the common way of adding
> > information to an already existing event. That'd will also make it a bit
> > less unbalanced IMHO.
>
> looking at this again with fresher eyes I think the unbalancedness simply
> doesn't matter. if we visualise it as a tree, then the sequence above looks
> like this:
>
> axis_frame
> +----> axis
> +----> axis
> | +----> axis_discrete
> +----> axis_source
>
> i.e. the source is at the same level that axis/axis_stop are. that makes it
> less unbalanced than it initially looked. and it avoids the "unknown" mess.
> so I think we should leave it as-is.
Yea, the only slightly odd thing is that source is like a mix between
"axis" and "axis_discrete" semantics wise (ignoring they belong extend
different events). But in this case it's pretty clear how to interpret
it so its no big deal.
>
> > >
> > > protocol/wayland.xml | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml b/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > index 48d0332..db9b164 100644
> > > --- a/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > +++ b/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > @@ -1579,6 +1579,30 @@
> > > </request>
> > >
> > > <!-- Version 5 additions -->
> > > + <event name="axis_frame" since="5">
> > > + <description summary="end of axis set event">
> > > + Indicates the end of a set of wl_pointer.axis events that logically
> > > + belong together.
> > > +
> > > + All wl_pointer.axis, wl_pointer.axis_stop, and
> > > + wl_pointer.axis_source before a wl_pointer.axis_frame event belong
> > > + logically together. For example, in a diagonal scroll motion the
> > > + compositor will send an optional wl_pointer.axis_source event, two
> > > + wl_pointer.axis events (horizontal and vertical) and finally a
> > > + wl_pointer.axis_frame event. The client may use this information to
> > > + calculate a diagonal vector for scrolling.
> > > +
> > > + When multiple wl_pointer.axis events occur within the same frame,
> > > + the motion vector is the combined motion of all events.
> > > + When a wl_pointer.axis and a wl_pointer.axis_stop event occur within
> > > + the same frame, this indicates that axis movement in one axis has
> > > + stopped but continues in the other axis.
> > > + When multiple wl_pointer.axis_stop events occur within in the same
> > > + frame, this indicates that these axes stopped in the same instance.
> > > +
> > > + Only one wl_pointer.axis_source event is permitted per axis frame.
> >
> > Should we maybe point out that axis_frame is guaranteed to come for
> > every axis event group, event though such a group might only be a single
> > axis event? Meaning, you'd never get an axis without an axis_frame.
>
> yep, easy enough. added:
>
> Only one wl_pointer.axis_source event is permitted per axis frame.
> +
> + A wl_pointer.axis_frame event is sent for every logical axis event
> + group, even if the group only contains a single wl_pointer.axis or
> + wl_pointer.axis_stop event. In other words, a client may get the
> + sequence: axis, axis_frame, axis, axis_frame, ...
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
With that, this patch (or even better, it squashed together with the
axis source patch) can have my RB.
Jonas
>
> >
> > > + </description>
> > > + </event>
> > >
> > > <enum name="axis_source">
> > > <description summary="axis source types">
> > > @@ -1605,9 +1629,9 @@
> > > Source information for scroll and other axes.
> > >
> > > This event does not occur on its own. It is sent before a
> > > - wl_pointer.axis or wl_pointer.axis_stop event and carries the source
> > > - information for that event. A client is expected to accumulate the
> > > - data in both events before proceeding.
> > > + wl_pointer.axis_frame event and carries the source information for
> > > + all events within that frame. A client is expected to accumulate the
> > > + data in all events events within the frame before proceeding.
> > >
> > > The source specifies how this event was generated. If the source is
> > > wl_pointer.axis_source.finger, a wl_pointer.axis_stop event will be
> > > --
> > > 2.4.3
> > >
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list