[PATCH weston v3 1/5] Expanded unit test framework to cover base requirements.

[Jon A. Cruz]

On 06/16/2015 06:21 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:15:52 +1000
> Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:50:47AM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2015 10:15 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:06:37PM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
> 
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + at page zunitc zunitc
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- @ref zunitc_overview
>>>>> +- @ref zunitc_execution
>>>>> +  - @ref zunitc_execution_commandline
>>>>> +  - @ref zunitc_execution_matching
>>>>> +  - @ref zunitc_execution_wildcards
>>>>> +  - @ref zunitc_execution_repeat
>>>>> +  - @ref zunitc_execution_randomize
>>>>> +- @ref zunitc_fixtures
>>>>> +- @ref zunitc_functions
>>>>
>>>> yikes, is there no way to get a page-level TOC?
>>>
>>> Not until version 1.8.1 or later. Wayland is currently only requiring 1.6+
>>
>> do we get any benefit out of not requiring 1.8.1? it was released three
>> years ago so I guess the real benefactor here is RHEL6. Which I obviously
>> support but then again this is just the documentation, not actual code that
>> can break.
> 
> FWIW, I have no objections to requiring 1.8.1, or at least not aware of any.
> 

On this point we could require 1.8.1+, which would in turn block distros
like Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Or we could leave the requirement at 1.6+ and
just use the 1.8.1+ feature. That should only result as a warning for
those on older systems yet still allow for the nicer features for those
on newer (and could save me a bit of typing when it comes to TOCs).


-- 
Jon A. Cruz - Senior Open Source Developer
Samsung Open Source Group
jonc at osg.samsung.com