[PATCH 1/7] test: type-safe two ck_assert invocations

[Peter Hutterer]

unsigned vs signed in both cases, but the ck_assert macros hide that
(everything is cast to intmax_t). The upcoming litest_assert wrappers expose
these warnings, so fix them ahead of time.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
---
 test/litest.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/litest.c b/test/litest.c
index c24a306..7764b8b 100644
--- a/test/litest.c
+++ b/test/litest.c
@@ -567,9 +567,10 @@ litest_init_udev_rules(struct litest_test_device *dev)
 		      UDEV_RULE_PREFIX,
 		      dev->shortname);
 	ck_assert_int_eq(rc,
+			 (int)(
 			 strlen(UDEV_RULES_D) +
 			 strlen(UDEV_RULE_PREFIX) +
-			 strlen(dev->shortname) + 7);
+			 strlen(dev->shortname) + 7));
 	f = fopen(path, "w");
 	ck_assert_notnull(f);
 	ck_assert_int_ge(fputs(dev->udev_rule, f), 0);
@@ -1126,7 +1127,7 @@ litest_scale(const struct litest_device *d, unsigned int axis, double val)
 	int min, max;
 	ck_assert_int_ge(val, 0);
 	ck_assert_int_le(val, 100);
-	ck_assert_int_le(axis, ABS_Y);
+	ck_assert_int_le(axis, (unsigned int)ABS_Y);
 
 	min = d->interface->min[axis];
 	max = d->interface->max[axis];
-- 
2.3.5