Patchwork to require git-send-email formatted patches?

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:35:35 +0000
Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com> wrote:

> Something else I noticed on this thead:
> 
> In the reply 20151019013047.GA8175 at jelly.local from Peter, there's a
> diff put there for reference, picked up as a patch by patchwork:
> 
>   http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20151019013047.GA8175@jelly.local
> 
> If you want patchwork to not consider those kind of diffs as real
> patches, there's a per-project option I can activate: only consider git
> send-email mails as potential patches.

Hi all,

I think we could turn that on. What do others think?

How is a git-send-email patch recognized? Would we miss patches that
are formatted with git-format-patch but sent by other means than
git-send-email?


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20151111/3099345d/attachment.sig>