Patchwork to require git-send-email formatted patches?

[Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1)]

Hi,

I personally create the patches with git format-patch and then copy to the email.
Because I have to use windows and outlook for my company email.

Best regards

Emre Ucan
Software Group I (ADITG/SW1)

Tel. +49 5121 49 6937

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Pekka Paalanen
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 13:02
> To: wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Damien Lespiau
> Subject: Patchwork to require git-send-email formatted patches?
> 
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:35:35 +0000
> Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Something else I noticed on this thead:
> >
> > In the reply 20151019013047.GA8175 at jelly.local from Peter, there's a
> > diff put there for reference, picked up as a patch by patchwork:
> >
> >
> >
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20151019013047.GA8175@j
> el
> > ly.local
> >
> > If you want patchwork to not consider those kind of diffs as real
> > patches, there's a per-project option I can activate: only consider
> > git send-email mails as potential patches.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I think we could turn that on. What do others think?
> 
> How is a git-send-email patch recognized? Would we miss patches that are
> formatted with git-format-patch but sent by other means than git-send-
> email?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> pq