[PATCH] protocol: Extend wl_touch with touch point shape

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On 3 April 2016 at 23:35, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> Agreed. And please specify the exact details of what is considered the
> major/minor axis (direction, orientation) and where the logical 0 is for the
> orientation. Referencing the kernel isn't good enough here, we need to make
> sure this is precise. Adding a few paragraphs to the documentation doesn't
> hurt and saves headaches later. Other than that, it looks good imo, thanks.

Yeah, AOL on all of the above and then it looks good to me as well.
The only other thing I'd add: is the reported touchpoint always at the
centre of the ellipse? If so, then it bears documenting, and if not
then we may need to prepare for a future centrepoint-reporting event?
The former probably makes the most sense, even if the kernel doesn't
specify it.

Cheers,
Daniel