[PATCH libinput] fix spelling mistakes (Eric Engestrom)

[Yong Bakos]

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 3:52 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:55:29 -0500
> Yong Bakos <junk at humanoriented.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2016 01:47:43 +0100
>>> From: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
>>> To: wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
>>> Subject: [PATCH libinput] fix spelling mistakes
>>> Message-ID: <1459644463-5419-1-git-send-email-eric at engestrom.ch>
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
>>> ---
>>> doc/t440-support.dox | 2 +-
>>> src/evdev-tablet.c   | 2 +-
>>> src/evdev.c          | 2 +-
>>> src/filter.c         | 2 +-
>>> src/libinput.h       | 8 ++++----
>>> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>> 
> 
>> 
>> Looks good, thanks. (Note that I am a novice reviewer.)
> 
> Hi Yong,
> 
> thank you for participating!
> 
> When you review things, you should include a line like this:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Real Name <my at email.address>
> 
> People pushing patches upstream will collect that and make it part of
> the commit message, like this:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/commit/?id=273874e3c715a7102add0030f200d0a0f17628fa

Got it, thank you. I've added this short instruction to
wayland-web/reviewing.html and will send the patch shortly.


> We also use Acked-by when a particular person accepts the change in
> principle, but has not properly reviewed the changes. This is usually
> when that person's acceptance is important somehow.
> 
> Btw. your recent review emails do not appear as replies to the patch
> emails. This makes matching them to the particular (revision of) the
> patch quite hard.

It's my fault due to trying to reconstruct the original emails from the
digests I receive, and I noticed this when seeing my unthreaded replies
on the list archive. Don't laugh! :) I've since switched to normal emails
rather than the digest. Of course, I can't receive the original PATCH emails,
but assuming that replies are matched by accurate subject lines, would you
like me to correct and re-send? (Let's please do what's easiest for
you / others.)

yong


> 
> Thanks,
> pq