[PATCH wayland-protocols 4/4] stable/presentation-time: rephrase request intro
Pekka Paalanen
ppaalanen at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 08:11:57 UTC 2016
From: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen at collabora.co.uk>
Attempting to clarify the paragraph. The key points are that feedback is
double-buffered, part of a commit as all double-buffered state is, and
it defines the term "content update" used later.
The new phrasing defines not only a content update, but also content
submission which is used further on in the spec. It implies the
double-buffered state semantics without actually using the term (it's
not really state to be applied), and makes a link with the very next
paragraph describing the prensentation time.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen at collabora.co.uk>
---
stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml b/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
index 4d164c1..62ae7be 100644
--- a/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
+++ b/stable/presentation-time/presentation-time.xml
@@ -36,11 +36,10 @@
presentation clock, which is defined in the
presentation.clock_id event.
- Request 'feedback' can be regarded as an additional wl_surface
- method. It is part of the double-buffered surface state update
- mechanism, where other requests first set up the state and then
- wl_surface.commit atomically applies the state into use. In
- other words, wl_surface.commit submits a content update.
+ A content update for a wl_surface is submitted by a
+ wl_surface.commit request. Request 'feedback' associates with
+ the wl_surface.commit and provides feedback on the content
+ update, particularly the final realized presentation time.
<!-- Completing presentation -->
--
2.7.3
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list