[PATCH weston 5/6] libweston: do not add libweston-$version to the Cflags

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Sat Jul 9 15:40:09 UTC 2016


On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:31:42 +0100
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 July 2016 at 19:18, Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+wayland at sardemff7.net> wrote:
> > On 07/07/2016 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote:  
> >>
> >> On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:  
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>> Therefore a NAK from me too.
> >>>  
> >> As you guys wish. In that case can we drop the pkgincludedir variable
> >> ? Most packages don't bother with it (on my local setup only 7 out of
> >> 740 do)  
> >
> >
> > Is there a strong reason to remove it? Right now I would see it as a noise
> > commit with no real value.
> >  
> If 100 to 1 ratio isn't enough, I don't think anything is. Then again,
> I'm wondering if the topic hasn't turned into a perfect bikeshedding
> example ?

Hi Emil,

if you really care about that one variable so much to write a patch
for it, I shall merge it. I believe nothing should be asking
the .pc about a pkgincludedir specifically, right?


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20160709/236d37a7/attachment.sig>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list