[PATCH weston 04/11] compositor: Avoid NULL pointer dereference

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 13:38:09 UTC 2016


On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:10:03 +0200
Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+wayland at sardemff7.net> wrote:

> On 18/06/2016 19:15, Armin Krezović wrote:
> > When there are no outputs present, an output pointer
> > can be NULL. Dereferencing such pointer will result
> > in a crash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  src/compositor.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/compositor.c b/src/compositor.c
> > index 37d94ec..d246046 100644
> > --- a/src/compositor.c
> > +++ b/src/compositor.c
> > @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@ weston_output_mode_switch_to_native(struct weston_output *output)
> >  	int ret;
> >  	int mode_changed = 0, scale_changed = 0;
> >
> > +	if (!output)  
> 
> Maybe do we want an assert here, and make sure the callers are properly 
> checking for NULL beforehand?

Yeah, I kind of wonder how might one end up calling this function with
NULL.

Armin, did you actually see it happen?

Patch 5 fixes this already for one of the two call sites, and
restore_output_mode() in fullscreen-shell.c would crash first if output
was NULL.

I'd propose to drop this patch and fix the call sites for now as half
of it is already done. The other alternative would be to move the
output->original_mode check both callers have into
weston_output_mode_switch_to_native() along with the NULL output check.
That would make restore_output_mode() wrappers unnecessary. It is also
questionable whether original_mode can even be NULL, or if it can,
maybe it shouldn't. I think the latter might be a nice clean-up, but
not essential at the moment.


Thanks,
pq

> > +		return -1;
> > +
> >  	if (!output->switch_mode)
> >  		return -1;
> >
> >  
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20160620/0ea289b4/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list