Kinetic scroll in libinput Xorg driver
Alexis BRENON @Wayland
brenon.alexis+wayland at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 06:57:53 UTC 2016
Just to be sure that I understand clearly, what you call 'Toolkit' is
libraries like GTK, Qt, and co. that are used by developers to build their
apps, isn't it ?
Finally, do you know some tiling DE/WM Wayland compliant ?
Kind,
Alexis.
Le mer. 26 oct. 2016 à 02:17, Carsten Haitzler <raster at rasterman.com> a
écrit :
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:42:31 +0000 "Alexis BRENON @Wayland" <brenon.alexis
> +wayland at gmail.com> said:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I would like to implement kinetic scroll in the libinput driver for Xorg.
> >
> > I know that it's probably not the intended use of libinput ; as explained
> > in the documentation, it's the client that have to manage that.
> >
> > However, as an Xorg user not happy with the synaptics driver, I would
> like
> > to add a similar feature (fixing small disagreements encountered with
> > synaptics) to libinput, allowing Xorg users to easily move to libinput
> > without losing this feature.
> >
> > My first idea is to implement the kinetic scroll using a thread that
> sends
> > axis events as long as there is no button event, key event or motion
> event
> > higher than a threshold.
> >
> > It makes some time since the last time I developed in C, and maybe it's
> not
> > the better way to do it. I would be happy to hear your advices.
> >
> > One thing I'm thinking of is then to add some options in the Xorg
> > configuration file to enable/disable this feature, choose the events
> > stopping the kinetic scroll and change some thresholds. This will allow
> to
> > easily disable this feature in the future in case the clients manage the
> > kinetic scroll on their own.
> >
> > What do you think of this? Is there someone already working on it? Is my
> > proposition a good way to implement it?
> >
> > Thanks for your attention.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Alexis BRENON.
>
> we already do kinetic scrolling higher up in the toolkit. we do
> acceleration
> using these events and we do smooth animated scrolling in our scroller and
> not
> just stepping, as well as momentum as we slid with bouncing at the ends.
> it's
> already done in toolkit out of the box. if you try and hack this in at the
> input layer this simply doubles the amount of this and likely makes the
> user
> experience worse. this would have to be off by default and if it's off by
> default... you need ways of turning it on client by client ... and even
> then
> there are a pile of other problems you'll hit. so my suggestion is -
> don't. add
> to your favorite toolkits instead if they don't have it. they have far more
> information about the context at the time and the use cases needed etc.
>
>
>
> --
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster at rasterman.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20161026/7975bac5/attachment.html>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list