[PATCH] eventloop: clarify post_dispatch_check()

[chris at cooperteam.net]

From: Christopher James Halse Rogers <christopher.halse.rogers at canonical.com>

This *technically* changes the semantics of the return value of the source callbacks.
Previously you could return a negative number from a source callback and it would prevent
*other* source callbacks from triggering a subsequent recheck.

Doing that seems like such a bad idea it's not worth supporting.

Signed-off-by: Christopher James Halse Rogers <christopher.halse.rogers at canonical.com>
---
 src/event-loop.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/event-loop.c b/src/event-loop.c
index 6130d2a..7d4c08d 100644
--- a/src/event-loop.c
+++ b/src/event-loop.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <sys/socket.h>
@@ -376,19 +377,18 @@ wl_event_loop_destroy(struct wl_event_loop *loop)
 	free(loop);
 }
 
-static int
+static bool
 post_dispatch_check(struct wl_event_loop *loop)
 {
 	struct epoll_event ep;
 	struct wl_event_source *source, *next;
-	int n;
+	bool needs_recheck = false;
 
 	ep.events = 0;
-	n = 0;
 	wl_list_for_each_safe(source, next, &loop->check_list, link)
-		n += source->interface->dispatch(source, &ep);
+		needs_recheck |= source->interface->dispatch(source, &ep) != 0;
 
-	return n;
+	return needs_recheck;
 }
 
 WL_EXPORT void
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ wl_event_loop_dispatch(struct wl_event_loop *loop, int timeout)
 {
 	struct epoll_event ep[32];
 	struct wl_event_source *source;
-	int i, count, n;
+	int i, count;
 
 	wl_event_loop_dispatch_idle(loop);
 
@@ -427,9 +427,7 @@ wl_event_loop_dispatch(struct wl_event_loop *loop, int timeout)
 
 	wl_event_loop_dispatch_idle(loop);
 
-	do {
-		n = post_dispatch_check(loop);
-	} while (n > 0);
+	while (post_dispatch_check(loop));
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.14.1