[RFC weston 0/9] weston-debug protocol, API, and tool

[Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)]

Hello Pekka,

Honestly speaking, I did not have time to evaluate it yet. Because I was on vacation.
I am planning to start this week. Hopefully, I can reply to you next week.

Best regards

Emre Ucan
Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)

Tel. +49 5121 49 6937

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:ppaalanen at gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 24. Juli 2017 16:34
> To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
> Cc: wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Friedrich, Eugen (ADITG/ESB)
> Subject: Re: [RFC weston 0/9] weston-debug protocol, API, and tool
> 
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:32:25 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 14:10:56 +0000
> > "Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)" <eucan at de.adit-jv.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pekka,
> > >
> > > I like your idea with scope trees. I want to play around a little bit
> > > with the protocol next week. Later I will finalize my proposal for
> > > the protocol. Maybe you are right and we can use the protocol as it
> > > is.
> 
> Hi Emre,
> 
> now that I have finally looked at your patches, I dare ask. ;-)
> How is it going with the debug stuff?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> pq
> 
> > >
> > > Do you think that the RFC is mergeable to upstream ? Are there
> > > something to address before ?
> >
> > Hi Emre,
> >
> > the two things that are missing are man-page for weston-debug and
> > finishing the protocol pretty-printer. The are noted in the respective
> > commit messages. After those, the series is mergeable in my opinion.
> >
> > More command line options and scope collections can well be added later.
> >
> > Do you think you want the protocol in wayland-protocols still? If yes,
> > that could be done first. However, I'm not quite sure the
> > weston-specific interface names good then, but I don't have better
> > ideas at the moment.
> >
> > If in wayland-protocols, it should be an unstable protocol (see the
> > README in wayland-protocols on how things need to be arranged).
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > pq