[PATCH weston v3] ivi-shell: add_screen_remove_layer API
Teyfel, Michael (ADITG/ESB)
mteyfel at de.adit-jv.com
Tue Jul 25 14:00:26 UTC 2017
Hi Pekka, hi Emre,
the test is implemented and also tested.
Best regards
Michael Teyfel
Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)
Tel. +49 5121 49 6932
-----Original Message-----
From: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
Sent: Montag, 24. Juli 2017 16:34
To: Pekka Paalanen
Cc: Eugen Friedrich; wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Teyfel, Michael (ADITG/ESB)
Subject: RE: [PATCH weston v3] ivi-shell: add_screen_remove_layer API
Hi Pekka,
We will implement a test for the API. No Problem.
Best regards
Emre Ucan
Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)
Tel. +49 5121 49 6937
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:ppaalanen at gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 24. Juli 2017 12:40
> To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
> Cc: Eugen Friedrich; wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH weston v3] ivi-shell: add_screen_remove_layer API
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:15:51 +0200
> Eugen Friedrich <friedrix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2017-03-02 9:47 GMT+01:00 Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1) <eucan at de.adit-
> jv.com>:
> > > It is analagous to layer_remove_surface API.
> > > The API removes a layer from the render order of the screen.
> > >
> > > v3:
> > > add the new vfunc at the end of
> > > the ivi_layout_interface struct.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Emre Ucan <eucan at de.adit-jv.com>
> > > ---
> > > ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > > ivi-shell/ivi-layout.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h
> > > b/ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h index 2317d6e..39ffde1 100644
> > > --- a/ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h
> > > +++ b/ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h
> > > @@ -578,6 +578,16 @@ struct ivi_layout_interface {
> > > */
> > > struct ivi_layout_surface *
> > > (*get_surface)(struct weston_surface *surface);
> > > +
> > > + /**
> > > + * \brief Remove a ivi_layer to a weston_output which is
> > > + currently
> managed
> > > + * by the service
> > > + *
> > > + * \return IVI_SUCCEEDED if the method call was successful
> > > + * \return IVI_FAILED if the method call was failed
> > > + */
> > > + int32_t (*screen_remove_layer)(struct weston_output *output,
> > > + struct ivi_layout_layer
> > > + *removelayer);
> > > };
> > >
> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > > diff --git a/ivi-shell/ivi-layout.c b/ivi-shell/ivi-layout.c index
> > > 64e4ead..5edf88b 100644
> > > --- a/ivi-shell/ivi-layout.c
> > > +++ b/ivi-shell/ivi-layout.c
> > > @@ -1663,6 +1663,27 @@ ivi_layout_screen_add_layer(struct
> weston_output *output,
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int32_t
> > > +ivi_layout_screen_remove_layer(struct weston_output *output,
> > > + struct ivi_layout_layer *removelayer)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ivi_layout_screen *iviscrn;
> > > +
> > > + if (output == NULL || removelayer == NULL) {
> > > + weston_log("ivi_layout_screen_remove_layer:
> > > + invalid
> argument\n");
> > > + return IVI_FAILED;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + iviscrn = get_screen_from_output(output);
> > > +
> > > + wl_list_remove(&removelayer->pending.link);
> > > + wl_list_init(&removelayer->pending.link);
> > > +
> > > + iviscrn->order.dirty = 1;
> > > +
> > > + return IVI_SUCCEEDED;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int32_t
> > > ivi_layout_screen_set_render_order(struct weston_output *output,
> > > struct ivi_layout_layer **pLayer,
> > > const int32_t number) @@
> > > -2087,6 +2108,7 @@ static struct ivi_layout_interface
> ivi_layout_interface = {
> > > */
> > > .get_screens_under_layer =
> ivi_layout_get_screens_under_layer,
> > > .screen_add_layer = ivi_layout_screen_add_layer,
> > > + .screen_remove_layer = ivi_layout_screen_remove_layer,
> > > .screen_set_render_order =
> ivi_layout_screen_set_render_order,
> > >
> > > /**
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wayland-devel mailing list
> > > wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
> >
> > Hi Emre,
> > api is definitely use full!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eugen Friedrich <friedrix at gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> R-b me, but this new function is missing tests I believe. Would be
> nice to get one, as the existing API has tests even for pretty trivial
> things.
>
> Pushed:
> 3e5303da..57ac260c master -> master
>
>
> Thanks,
> pq
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list