[PATCH weston] Update COPYING
bryce at osg.samsung.com
Wed Mar 1 00:22:53 UTC 2017
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:17:21PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> I'd be fine to reduce it to the minimal license text, but that doesn't
> >> free us up from needing to check incoming source to make sure it
> >> conforms to the same license. We should really also merge data/COPYING
> >> into the core COPYING.
> > Obviously checking licenses on incoming code is always extremely
> > important. :-)
> > I'm not sure what you're suggesting by reducing it to the minimal
> > license, the file only includes one license statement so appears to be
> > minimal already; I'm not suggesting copyrights *shouldn't* be present,
> > or that any of the existing ones should be removed. AIUI it's required
> > to have at least one copyright statement, and seems pretty standard to
> > list the major copyright holders (esp. any companies/individuals with a
> > legal interest.) The main purpose of COPYING, though, is the licensing,
> > to document how the codebase can be shared and reused.
> > You're probably right that merging data/COPYING and COPYING makes
> > sense, but I've seen enough other projects that had subdir-specific
> > licensing gunk that I'm not really worried about it. I'd be fine
> > either way.
> Yeah, I don't think we're big enough that having separate files makes
> much sense. What I'm mostly just stuck with is the copyright
> statements: at the moment, we list a few but don't go on to list any
> others. I'd suggest an incomplete statement is the worst of both
> worlds: should we maybe just list the applicable licenses with a
> 'Copyright © 2008-2017 multiple authors' and the license text, with a
> note to check the individual files to determine who owns copyright
> over which part?
Yes, that seems like a good approach to me. That should address all the
I probably would avoid the 'multiple authors' phrasing in the individual
.c files as probably too ambiguous legally, however I've seen plenty of
projects use that in their code.
More information about the wayland-devel