[RFC wayland 2/9] wayland-egl: correct wayland-egl.pc description/version

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Thu Oct 5 12:41:31 UTC 2017


On 5 October 2017 at 13:39, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 September 2017 at 14:00, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> With the above data in mind, we can reuse the current Wayland version
>> It should just work for all the known cases, plus it provides
>> consistency  as a nice bonus.
> Daniel reminded me that my suggestion above is bonkers. Apparently I
> missed the leading "1." in Wayland version 1.15.
> I think we should be able to update the three components quite easily
> and thus use the Wayland version.
> Alternatively I'm all ears. Anyone?

Honestly I think we should just use the Mesa version and document it
as a historical aberration. Total version purity is nice, but I can't
at all see how it's worth breaking peoples' compilation. If I was a
downstream, I'd be pretty upset about that.


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list