[PATCH wayland-protocols] Add action binder protocol
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Mon Apr 9 05:49:37 UTC 2018
Hey, look, almost year later and I found this email. In my defence, I was on
an airplane at the time, hence I missed this :)
This came up in #wayland where pekka linked to it, so I figured I might as
well look through it.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:19:06PM +0200, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> From: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git at sardemff7.net>
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git at sardemff7.net>
> ---
>
> As for one-off vs. sustained actions, alternative wording was suggested:
> - one-shot vs. sustained
> - instantaneous vs. sustained
> - immediate vs. driven
> - triggered vs. initiated
>
> unstable/action-binder/README | 4 +
> .../action-binder/action-binder-unstable-v1.xml | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 unstable/action-binder/README
> create mode 100644 unstable/action-binder/action-binder-unstable-v1.xml
>
> diff --git a/unstable/action-binder/README b/unstable/action-binder/README
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..07fe7d4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/unstable/action-binder/README
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +action binder protocol
> +
> +Maintainers:
> +Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+wayland at sardemff7.net>
> diff --git a/unstable/action-binder/action-binder-unstable-v1.xml b/unstable/action-binder/action-binder-unstable-v1.xml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a0e086b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/unstable/action-binder/action-binder-unstable-v1.xml
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> +<protocol name="action_binder_unstable_v1">
> +
> + <copyright>
> + Copyright © 2015-2017 Quentin “Sardem FF7” Glidic
> +
> + Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this
> + software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted
> + without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in
> + all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission
> + notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of
> + the copyright holders not be used in advertising or publicity
> + pertaining to distribution of the software without specific,
> + written prior permission. The copyright holders make no
> + representations about the suitability of this software for any
> + purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied
> + warranty.
> +
> + THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS
> + SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
> + FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
> + SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
> + WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN
> + AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION,
> + ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF
> + THIS SOFTWARE.
> + </copyright>
> +
> + <interface name="zwp_action_binder_v1" version="1">
> + <description summary="action binder">
> + This interface is designed to allow any application to bind
> + an action.
> +
> + An action is an arbitrary couple of a namespace and a name describing the
> + wanted behaviour. These two strings are not meant to be user-visible.
> + Some namespaces are well-known and shared by applications while each
> + application can have its own namespaces for internal actions.
> + It is possible to have the same action in several namespaces, e.g. to
> + allow application-specific bindings in addition to global actions.
I may have missed some conversation there but without examples it's a bit
hard to understand how the namespace and name separation is supposed to
work. Something like "generic" and "copy" maybe? Or "gimp", "tool:eraser"?
Can you expand on that?
> +
> + It is left to the compositor to determine which client will get events.
> + The choice can be based on policy, heuristic, user configuration, or any
> + other mechanism that may be relevant.
> + Here are some examples of dispatching choice: all applications, last
> + focused, user-defined preference order, latest fullscreened application.
> +
> + This object is a singleton global.
> + </description>
> +
> + <request name="destroy" type="destructor">
> + <description summary="unbind from the binder interface">
> + Informs the server that the client will not be using this protocol
> + object anymore. You must destroy any wp_action_binding created from the
> + wp_action_binder before.
> + </description>
> + </request>
> +
> + <request name="get_binding">
> + <description summary="creates a binding object">
> + Creates a binding object. It will be used by the application to bind
> + one or more actions and get the corresponding events.
> + </description>
> +
> + <arg name="id" type="new_id" interface="zwp_action_binding_v1"
> + summary="the new binding interface id" />
> + </request>
> + </interface>
> +
> + <interface name="zwp_action_binding_v1" version="1">
> + <description summary="binding to an action">
> + This interface represents a binding to a set of actions.
> +
> + Depending on the user configuration, an action can be either one-off or
> + sustained. The client must handle all the three events and either make
> + sense of them or ignore them properly.
> + </description>
> +
> + <enum name="error">
> + <entry name="reserved" value="0"
> + summary="the action is reserved by the compositor" />
> + </enum>
> +
> + <request name="destroy" type="destructor">
> + <description summary="unbind the actions">
> + The client no longer wants to receive events for these actions.
> + </description>
> + </request>
> +
> + <request name="bind">
> + <description summary="bind an action">
> + Bind an action to the object. Multiple actions can be bound at the same
> + time. That means any combination of events can occur.
> + If the action is reserved by the compositor a protocol error is raised.
> + </description>
> +
> + <arg name="action_namespace" type="string" summary="the action namespace" />
> + <arg name="action_name" type="string" summary="the action name" />
> + </request>
> +
> + <event name="triggered">
> + <description summary="the action triggered">
> + This event is sent for one-off actions.
> +
> + If a binding would trigger both triggered and started events, the
> + started event must be sent first.
> + </description>
This almost certainly needs a value, but at that point it gets a bit harder.
The example in the recent #wayland discussion was the wacom tablet pad
strip but this can get more convoluted quickly. A strip has one
value but 2d manipulations (pinch-and-rotate) can have more axes. So maybe
something like
<event name="value">
<description summary="the value for the subsequent action">
This event is sent before started, stopped, or triggered and contains
the value for the subsequent started, stopped, or triggered event. More
than one value event may be sent, a client must accumulate all values
in the order they are sent. The values are namespace/action specific.
</description>
</event>
It's not any more generic than the rest of the protocol ;)
Cheers,
Peter
> + </event>
> +
> + <event name="started">
> + <description summary="the action started">
> + This event is sent when a sustained action is started.
> + </description>
> + </event>
> +
> + <event name="stopped">
> + <description summary="the action stopped">
> + This event is sent when a sustained action is stopped.
> + </description>
> + </event>
> + </interface>
> +</protocol>
> --
> 2.13.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list