[PATCH] protocol: allow to send a zero physical output size
fourdan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 09:44:35 UTC 2018
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 11:34, Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr> wrote:
> On July 13, 2018 12:00 PM, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 at 12:27, Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr> wrote:
> > > Physical size doesn't always make sense for all outputs. In case
> > > it's not available or not relevant, allow compositors to send zero.
> > > ---
> > > In practice this doesn't seem to break any client toolkit. We've been
> > > doing that for a long time in wlroots.
> > Seems legitimate to me. I'd like to hear if anyone else touching
> > output has thoughts, but this is:
> > Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels at collabora.com>
> Thanks for the ack. Olivier, Jonas, do you have opinions about this?
FWIW, this is what Xrandr does, it makes sense to me as well, at least
from an Xwayland point of view :)
More information about the wayland-devel