[PATCH wayland-protocols v4] Add zwp_linux_explicit_synchronization_v1
alexandros.frantzis at collabora.com
Tue Nov 6 12:12:13 UTC 2018
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 06:07:56PM +0000, Simon Ser wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 10:50 AM, Alexandros Frantzis <alexandros.frantzis at collabora.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 02:44:53PM +0000, Simon Ser wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> > > > > > + Explicit synchronization is guaranteed to be supported only for buffers
> > > > > > + created with any version of the zwp_linux_dmabuf buffer factory.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we can drop the "z" prefix here.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, not sure about this. We would be using a protocol prefix/name
> > > > combination that doesn't exist (yet). Of course the intention is clear,
> > > > but I think it would be better to update this to, e.g.,
> > > > (z)wp_linux_dmabuf, when linux_dmabuf actually becomes stable.
> > >
> > > Then add the v1 suffix zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1?
> > The "any version" of zwp_linux_dmabuf was meant to cover both _v* and
> > version="*", but I guess that's not clear enough. Perhaps "with any
> > version of zwp_linux_dmabuf_v*"? In any case, I am also fine with just
> > adding _v1 for now and updating as needed in the future.
> It's not uncommon to refer to the not-yet-existing stable versions of the
> protocols in their unstable versions.
Since there are precedents in the repo of using the not-yet-existing
stable name, and as long as it's clear that this is a general reference
to all unstable and stable versions, I will go with that.
More information about the wayland-devel