[PATCH v8 2/6] tests: support waitpid

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 08:38:23 UTC 2019

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:21:44 +0200
Leonid Bobrov <mazocomp at disroot.org> wrote:

> You know, I think this whole patch is silly, because waitid() is part of
> POSIX, FreeBSD and NetBSD implement it while OpenBSD and DragonFly BSD
> don't. I'll ask OpenBSD upstream to merge NetBSD's implementation and
> DragonFly BSD upstream to merge FreeBSD's implementation.
> OpenBSD aims standardization so we should blame OpenBSD.

Ok, sounds good to me. Whether that happens or not, I don't see a
reason to keep two different paths in these specific cases of
waitid/waitpid, because using waitid does not seem to have any benefit
over waitpid here.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20190305/5df72a07/attachment.sig>

More information about the wayland-devel mailing list