[Xcb] XCB structure

Bart Massey bart@cs.pdx.edu
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:28:01 -0800

In message <20031030014906.GL813@sharp.ath.cx> you wrote:
> XCB now generates two libraries: libXCB, with the core protocol only,
> and libXCBext, which currently has the SHAPE, SHM, RENDER, and DPMS
> extensions (because that's exactly the set of extensions that anyone has
> implemented yet).

I thought the plan was to have one library per extension,
and use library dependency magic to ensure that the
extension libraries brought in the core?  Or am I confused?
In any case, is there any reason to have just the core
without extensions?