[Xcb] OK, maybe API isn't *quite* stable... :-(

[Vincent Torri]

> The other issue is the awful naming convention. Getting names to have
> sensible case is a matter of a little bit of XSLT work and a little
> fixing of the protocol descriptions -- but porting existing code is
> going to be a pain. Still, I think this is something we should do. I
> know exactly what I was thinking when I picked the name
> "XCBConnSetupSuccessRep", and it was really dumb.

I've read that xml will be replaced by python. If so, we should be clear
on what the naming convention is. For my part, I like the usual c-style
(downcase, _ separated)

There is a draft about the naming convention (the xcb site is down for
me, I can't check) ?

Vincent