PATCH: Re: [Xcb] building without 'check'

[Jamey Sharp]

On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:56 -0700, Travis Spencer wrote:
> On 5/14/05, Travis Spencer <tspencer at cs.pdx.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:02:49AM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> > > People have occasionally asked if it's possible to build XCB without
> > > having the 'check' unit test framework installed. Now it is... sort of.
> > > If you want this, 'cvs update' and look at
> > > http://xcb.freedesktop.org/wiki/NoCheck for instructions.
> ...
> > > If somebody can automate the remaining step, that would be cool.
> > 
> > The attached patch will do it.  
> ...
> > I tested the attached patch on an x86 Linux machine and a Sol box.
> > It compiled on both without a hitch.
> 
> This patch never got applied.  Was there something wrong with it?  If
> so, let me know, and I'll try to fix it if I can.

I'm sorry I forgot about your patch. I didn't immediately apply it
because I didn't really like shipping a local copy of a file from the
check package: if the check maintainers decide to change that file, I
don't think aclocal will pick it up.

I have no idea how to fix that.

--Jamey