[Xcb] Where's XCBRenderFindStandardFormat ?

[Keith Packard]

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 14:39 -0700, Barton C Massey wrote:

> Not at all.  First of all, these libraries will be atop XCB,
> instead of aside it as with Xlib.  Second of all, multiple
> single-purpose libraries---don't want it or like it?  don't
> link against it.  Third of all, small size.  Fourth, thread
> transparency and latency hiding.  Shall I continue? :-)

Many small libraries make for very slow program startup.

We may want to consider precisely what kind of partitioning is
appropriate here.  I suggest that we focus more on avoiding additional
dependencies than strictly limiting code size.

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20050517/89eb9483/attachment.pgp