[Xcb] demo/util fixes for the extension split

[Vincent Torri]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Barton C Massey wrote:

> I think Josh wants to autogenerate the .pcs for extensions
> from some kind of XML description, which is why your patch
> hasn't yet been committed.  We should probably just commit
> it, though; we can always back it out when we get the fancy
> thing working.

Maybe, but right now, NO app using xcb extensions (except those being in
xcb core) can be compiled. It might be useful to fix that quickly, in a
way or another.

also, I don't see the point in generating them from xml files, as the
compilation of these extensions have been hand-made, by changing the
Makefile.am in xcb/src/. I would have seen the point if ALL the extension
stuff is done automatically. As it's not the case...

Vincent

> 	Bart
>
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.51.0604240739230.24296 at cartan.iecn.u-nancy.fr> you wrote:
> >
> > Hey !
> >
> > I don't think it's the correct patch, for 2 reasons :
> >  * the name of the splitted library can change later (it would be strange,
> > yes)
> >  * more important, the location of the splitted extension can be else
> > where that xcb-aux one.
> >
> > I've added in bugzilla a fix, which adds a .pc for each splitted
> > extension. It works (Ive also made the changes for xcb-utils and
> > xcb-demo, and another lib that uses xcb). I wait for an answer from the
> > devs.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here's a patch to fix xcb-demo and xcb-util for the recent extension split.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Donnie
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xcb mailing list
> > Xcb at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb
>