[Xcb] leak in lissajoux

Barton C Massey bart at cs.pdx.edu
Fri Apr 28 16:14:49 PDT 2006


Perhaps.  Probably potential preexisting project port
pluralities prefer pursuing performance problems
preemptively perforce.


In message <20060428181652.GC17524 at id.minilop.net> you wrote:
> The API we have now is presently passable, particularly for
> people porting preexisting projects.

More information about the Xcb mailing list