[Xcb] documentation.

[Jamey Sharp]

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:50:08PM -0500, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> Is the plan to use the doc tag for extension documentation as well?

I would strongly discourage using the <doc> tag, in its current form,
in the XML protocol descriptions. It's just a convenience in the XSLT:
its input is required to be valid Doxygen comments, so it doesn't meet
my requirements for higher-level documentation in the XML.

--Jamey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20061128/e28bd26f/attachment.pgp