[Xcb] xid

[Jamey Sharp]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:15:20AM -0400, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> I think this is why we shouldn't use xcb_generate_id() because there's
> nothing that explicitly tells us these are xids. It's going to be
> confusing to people without an explicit generate/new.

Ah, *this* argument I think I can understand. You're just worried that
people won't be able to tell the difference between an xcb_window_t and
an xcb_visualid_t, in terms of how to get one?

I think you're arguing that xcb_window_new was useful as documentation.
I suspect we should address your concern with *actual* documentation.
I'd welcome patches for that.

--Jamey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20061012/2af13a2a/attachment.pgp