[Xcb] Re: new SELinux protocol reply problem

[Jamey Sharp]

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 08:40:08PM -0500, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> I was under the assumption that we didn't need to specify padding at the 
> end of a reply because it was taken care of.  I think the server-side xcb 
> would do the same.

For the record, I agree on both counts. :-)

--Jamey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20070224/a6993674/attachment.pgp