[Xcb] [PATCH] Making XCB less of a memory hog

[Tilman Sauerbeck]

Thomas Hunger [2007-05-11 20:16]:
> > What do you think about the patch in general, and the idea to
> > extend the API so we can make use of it right now instead of in n
> > years, when we might be able to break the API?
> 
> I believe that xcb_send_request is not a part of the public 
> api. "xcbext.h" is only included in the c files.

Yeah, but it's exported, and it's documented etc.
libX11 uses it, e.g.

Regards,
Tilman

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20070511/44a3f82e/attachment.pgp