[Xcb] Reply Buffering Question

[Vincent Torri]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Eamon Walsh wrote:
>> I'm assuming that I can't do something like the following:
>>
>>   iterator = xcb_input_list_input_devices_devices_iterator(reply);
>
> Honestly, function names that are as long as this one feel
> totally wrong to me.  I believe long function names are a good
> indicator for crappy code and wrong software design.  Especially
> from a C programmer perspective, hell this is not Java...

the functions are generated from an xml description. So there are some 
function names that are a bit long

And I don't know why a big length of a function name leads to crapy code 
and wrong software design.

thanks for your support

Vincent