No subject
Mon May 25 13:16:58 PDT 2009
defined in XML any more than xcb_generic_event_t should be[1]. For that
matter, xcb_ge_event_t is already defined in libxcb/xcb.h.
I don't see a really compelling reason not to also define it in the XML.
It just feels redundant.
Peter Harris
[1] Ugh. Feels like a namespace collision. But there was no way to know
that someone would come up with "Generic Events" years after this name
was chosen.
--
Open Text Connectivity Solutions Group
Peter Harris http://www.opentext.com/connectivity
Research and Development Phone: +1 905 762 6001
pharris at opentext.com Toll Free: 1 877 359 4866
More information about the Xcb
mailing list