[Xcb] Whatever happened to the XCloseDisplay() hooks?

Jamey Sharp jamey at minilop.net
Wed Oct 14 12:17:19 PDT 2009


I agree with the general sentiments of Bart's note here: libxcb
currently provides no callbacks under any circumstances, and I want to
see a very convincing argument before changing that. That isn't a
"no", just a request for more discussion.

Of course as Julien pointed out after I started composing this, we
can't have every library providing its own disconnect wrapper, so
Bart, I think your proposal can't work.

I'd argue in a different direction: higher layers should manage
caches. The cairo XCB surface constructors could take a
cairo-xcb-connection object instead of the xcb_connection_t. That
object would be constructed from an xcb_connection_t and contain any
caches you want. The caller can decide when to allocate and free that
association.

What nightmare arises if you take that approach?

Jamey


More information about the Xcb mailing list