[Xcb] planning to remove xprint, libxprintutil and related packages
Julien Danjou
julien at danjou.info
Thu Apr 21 08:18:11 PDT 2011
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> - In libxcb master, I'd be happy to change configure.ac to default to
> not building xprint. I'd personally continue building it because I
> build all known extensions, just to check for build regressions, but
> there's no reason everybody else needs to.
>
> - For Debian, while I can't argue with your point, Julien, that "I don't
> see any good reason not to build it," I also don't see any good reason
> *to* build it, and I have a lot of sympathy with wanting to "hide that
> Xprint ever existed." :-)
If the decision to disable its building by default in XCB is taken, I
think we should follow XCB decision in the Debian packaging and disable
(or "not enable") its building.
But for the XCB-side decision, I really don't have enough hindsight to
have a decent opinion, so I'll leave that up to you. :)
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20110421/cfeb70dc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xcb
mailing list