[Xcb] Are the util-common-m4 submodules relative on purpose?
Arnaud Fontaine
arnaud at andesi.org
Wed Mar 23 18:49:29 PDT 2011
Hi,
>> Yes, it is relative on purpose. There are several reasons for
>> this, such as being easier for developers (you may want to write
>> code for util-common-m4 and test it in util-wm
> A relative url neither helps nor hinder.
If you want to publish your own copy of util* somewhere else, then you
will have to modify .gitsubmodules (and perform a commit for that) to
match the location of your repositories AFAIK.
>> without modifying .gitsubmodules) and you may not want to use git
>> protocol.
> Why would you not want to use a git url? This is what all modules
> use.
And SSH?
> Was the relative url typed in or create by the "git submodule add"
> command? It just doesn't "feel" right. I can't find anything
> really bad about it yet, but I surprised you found "several
> reasons" for choosing it.
As I said before, it was done on purpose (e.g. I explicitely specified a
relative URL to "git submodule add").
Cheers,
Arnaud
More information about the Xcb
mailing list