[Xcb] [PATCH 1/2] flames: update for xcb-util >= 0.3.8

William Swanson swansontec at gmail.com
Sat Nov 17 07:08:42 PST 2012


On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Uli Schlachter <psychon at znc.in> wrote:
> Dunno if we should care (how clean is the rest of the code?) but this leaks the
> xcb_intern_atom_reply_t. Perhaps it would be best not to have something like
> this in the demos.

Indeed, and any error will cause it to crash. I considered doing it
correctly, but the rest of the code is equally bad, and it seemed
strange to suddenly have this code act differently.

-William


More information about the Xcb mailing list