[Xcb] xcb recursive write not protected in all cases?

[Keith Packard]

Uli Schlachter <psychon at znc.in> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On 11.03.2014 14:24, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> [...]
>> Keith, could you reword the comment from your patch a bit and send a new version
>> with my Reviewed-by? IMO the patch still does more than really necessary, but it
>> definitely is better than the current state of affairs.
> [...]
>
> Is the attached OK? The diff is the changes I did to your patch.

Looks like you replaced 'Xlib owning' with 'an external socket owner',
right? That's certainly correct, and the rest of the patch looks like
what I hacked up. As you say, it may be more than strictly necessary,
but I think it's pretty easy to follow now at least?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20140330/031c979f/attachment.sig>