<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - libpthread-stubs must NOT provide symbols which depend on actual implementation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98048#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - libpthread-stubs must NOT provide symbols which depend on actual implementation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98048">bug 98048</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ben@bwidawsk.net" title="Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>"> Ben Widawsky</a> <pre>(In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98048#c2">comment #2</a>) > Actually seems like libpthreads-stub has decided to pick the hacky patch, > despite my suggestion not to :-\ > > Rob, Ben, you recall when I said it is not a good idea and it will cause > grief ;-) Can you remind me of the conversation? Pthread stubs are just stubs, I'm confused why it's a bad idea to add stubbed symbols which are actually required to build. If you need the functionality, and it's not provided by libc, I don't see how not having a stubbed function will save you. > Well here it is (ableit not sure what/how exactly libpthread-stubs.so ends > up in Ian's link chain) > > Gents, can we revert fa6db2f9c018c54a47e94c0175450303d700aa92 ? I'm fine with revert as long as things still build. I'd like to understand things a bit better first.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>