mosfet claims

[Daniel Stone]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:28:23AM -0500, Mosfet wrote:
> Okay, wonderful, this is indeed good news.
> 
> As far as the XWin stuff, the the situation was this:
> 
> 1) There is a lot of private discussion and nothing public being said.

There were public IRC discussions (#xwin), and logs of the confcalls.

> 2) Someone I know pretty well said you personally were involved in getting 
> both glibc and gconf into Keith's X server.

Aside from the fact that the only X server that you could call "Keith's" is
KDrive (the vendor string is "Keith Packard"), a quick check of the list
archives would've dispelled this.

> 3) I posted it as unconfirmed on my site.

You didn't think to email and check, first?

> I'm very glad to hear you unconditionally shot this down!

Mmh. I was going to send you an email about the same when I got in today, but
Havoc beat me to it.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel at fooishbar.org>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to implement"
  -- Havoc Pennington, gnome-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20030816/150db8bd/attachment.pgp