next level of freedesktop.org
hp at redhat.com
Thu Jul 17 18:05:42 EEST 2003
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:20:12AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> The point made about separating the specifications work from the
> implementation work is a good one. Maybe just a separate list for
> discussing specifications would suffice, though.
Separate list and web pages sound good. I'd like to host on the same
machine just to save work...
> I'm not sure whether "defining a platform" would work too well in
> practice. You're always going to have bits some people don't want and
> not have other bits that some people do want.
> But having a bunch of projects on a common release train cycle might
> work well ...
This is one key thing I want to get out of it; to have the drive of a
We do need to start defining a platform, in my view. Yes it's hard,
and there will be hard arguments, but ultimately it's necessary for
success. GNOME and KDE manage to do it so I think it can be done. We
just have to be careful to operate by consensus and not force through
things that aren't ready or don't have adequately broad support.
> So, yeah it sounds like a sensible, natural progression. I don't think
> you'll have any trouble finding people to help out ... but have you
> investigated funding yet ?
If we have servers, that should cover all the money we need for now at
least, I think.
More information about the xdg