hal draft spec
david at fubar.dk
Wed Sep 10 10:46:45 EEST 2003
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 02:19, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I think your mail looks like it's very much on the right track, fwiw.
> I'd suggest that we create an account for you on freedesktop.org and you
> can start working in CVS and maybe set up a download/information web
> page. A dedicated mailing list might be smart, too, but you're welcome
> to use this one for now. May take a little more time than usual to get
> things set up since we're in a server migration.
Thanks for the feedback.
So I guess I will create a page with some kind of draft specification of
libhal and hald components and how desktop environments and applications
interact with these - basically based on what was in my initial mail and
any feedback I may receive from this list.
When that is settled, I need to tweak my prototype implementation to
adhere to that draft spec, put in some (quick and dirty?) device-list
format (a requirement for being useful for anyone but me), and then
release it for public scrutiny :-)
> In any case, if you want send me an ssh v2 public key (ssh-keygen, send
> id_dsa.pub) and a preferred login name and I'll create an account.
> Once you have a place to work it's really just a matter of making the
> code run, and collecting as much feedback/info as you can from potential
> library users - GNOME/KDE people, distribution people, whoever - I find
> that can be crucial to getting a library accepted, since it's hard to
> anticipate a priori which issues will be important to someone.
I agree - I think the best thing initially is to focus on a) having a
proper spec; b) release an implementation conforming to that spec so
people can try it out; c) getting buy-in to that spec; and finally d)
make timely releases whenever the spec changes.
We might change implementation code later, but that is less important if
desktop application authors / device vendors / os vendors will buy into
I guess the important thing here is to cater for the desktop application
authors initially, since they are capable of writing device-info files
themselves for testing.
> I guess a proof of concept demo showing the desktop nicely handling a
> USB device would do a lot to sell the library as well. ;-) Maybe someone
> will even volunteer to help out with the desktop bits.
That sounds like a plan - I suspect that the aforementioned *_hal_watcher
program is (one of) the desktop pieces missing for such a POC. Any help on
this is welcome.
I realize that I need to release some implementation before any real work
can start on the desktop pieces. I'm hoping to have that ready within the
next few weeks.
More information about the xdg