Shared documentation system
Cornelius Schumacher
schumacher at kde.org
Wed Feb 4 15:18:27 EET 2004
On Saturday 03 January 2004 23:11, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> At this point, I've basically agreed on desktop files as the metadata
> format. KDE already uses this format, and I don't see any objections
> from any other parties.
Ok.
> So first we need to standardize on keys. The desktop entry spec has a
> Type key. I think this should be used and set to "Documentation". We
> can probably all agree on the keys Name, Comment, Icon, DocPath, and
> Lang. I think we should have a ContentType key, which would give the
> MIME type of the referenced documentation.
Agreed.
> I've said a few times that I'd like to work with something like the menu
> spec, so of course I'd like Categories, OnlyShowIn, and NotShowIn, as in
>
> http://freedesktop.org/Standards/menu-spec/0.8/ar01s03.html
Ok.
> And, of course, we need something like Identifier, what KDE currently
> uses X-DOC-Identifier for. I rather like the identifier scheme that I
> outlined earlier:
>
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/xdg-list/2003-December/msg00160.html
>
> As a recap, identifiers would use a slash-separated string as a simple
> namespacing mechanism. Every identifier is under one of a couple of
> standard top-level namespaces. Additional namespaces can be introduced
> below that.
Sounds good.
> I would like a Replaces key in the metadata that gives a list of IDs of
> documents that this document replaces.
Yes, that might be useful.
> If we can get some agreement on the basics, I can start to write up a
> specification for this. It'll need a place to live on the web, of
> course.
As we seem to agree on the basics it would be really great if you would come
up with an initial draft for a specification. I think the most logical would
be to host it on freedesktop.org as "Documentation Meta Information"
specification or something like that.
--
Cornelius Schumacher <schumacher at kde.org>
More information about the xdg
mailing list