Writing Shared Libraries, first draft

Mike Hearn mike at navi.cx
Mon Nov 8 13:03:32 EET 2004

Alexander Larsson wrote:
> No. This is bad. It'll allow less functions to be added on arches with
> 64bit function pointers than on 32bit, thus making half the allocated
> padding space useless.

So using function pointers as padding is the correct thing to do then?

Is there any way to pad structures that is "correct" at all?

thanks -mike

More information about the xdg mailing list