An analysis about a generic desktop application configuration management system
apenwarr at nit.ca
Tue Apr 12 02:15:16 EEST 2005
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:44:06PM -0400, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> And frankly, looking at the KDE4 timeline, and your lofty list of goals
> that's not very likely (particularly the well-testedness)
Where is the KDE4 timeline? I can't find it in the usual place I look:
The prevailing suggestion for a shared configuration system, ie. one in
which you talk to a config daemon using D-BUS, appears to me like you
wouldn't have to change the KConfig API or ABI in order to implement it.
That reduces your potential problems quite a lot, I think. You still
wouldn't want to do it at the last minute - bugs in KConfig will obviously
affect the whole system - but at least it seems clear that *fixing* the bugs
would require changing only kdelibs implementation, not API, which is
allowed until the deep freeze phase.
More information about the xdg